What it would do:

Continue to allow private ambulance services to require their emergency medical service employees to remain on call during meal and rest breaks. Also guarantees technicians additional training and some paid medical health services.

What it would cost the government:

Ever so slightly lower EMT contract costs will likely save local governments some money.

Why it is on the ballot:

Good question! Two years ago, the state Supreme Court ruled that security guards cannot be required to keep their radios on and remain on call while enjoying their meal or break time. A number of private ambulance firms are now facing class action lawsuits in California courts over similar break time violations, including American Medical Response, the Colorado-based company backing the initiative. Those cases are still pending, but the companies involved want a specific exemption written into law.

Arguments

Arguments in Favor:

Just like police and firefighters, emergency medical response technicians need to be on-call when the worst happens. This proposition would ensure that workers are compensated for missed or interrupted breaks.

Arguments Against:

This initiative is being pushed by an industry looking for a special carve-out from state labor law. They should just follow the rules

Videos

See for yourself

Supporters/Opponents

Supporters

American Medical Response

California Republican Party

Mercury News and East Bay Times editorial boards

Sacramento Bee editorial board

Opponents

California Democratic Party

California Teachers Association

Democratic Assemblyman Freddie Rodriguez

Data

Prop. 11 Campaign Contributions

Going Deeper

Editorial

Prop. 11 will solve ambulance workers’ on-call issue

Commentary

Prop. 11 will skirt pay for ambulance workers and put them at risk

Editorial

The Chronicle recommends: No on California Prop.11